Dr Samuel Annor, Chief Executive Officer of NHIA

National Health Insurance Authority (NHIA) is proposing an increase of the 2.5 per cent NHIS levy collected under the Value Added Tax (VAT) to 3.5 per cent.

 Chief Executive Officer of NHIA, Dr Samuel Annor, argued that the current contribution was woefully inadequate to fund the insurance scheme.

According to him, the proposal, if approved, will salvage the collapsing scheme.

He indicated that government was currently deliberating on the proposal submitted and hoped that latest by March 2018, a decision would have been made on the proposal.

Dr Annor urged civil society and the public to influence the decision that will be made by government by letting it know what the citizenry want changes in the law and the amount channelled to the scheme.

“You know very well that the government listens to the people, if this is what the people want the government is more inclined to act on that. We have a government, which is pro health, we might end up with a government in the future that is not pro health and will say that if you’re sick go and find your money and pay for healthcare. This government is pro health; we have to rally civil society and the public to be in tune that this is what we want.

…This is the thinking in the world, in the past the IMF, World Bank thought education and health were bad investment. But they’ve all swung 360 degrees to say that the best investment for every country is education and health. When the people are educated and healthy, the economy grows; it grows at a speed that is shocking.”

Dr Annor disclosed that the NHIA had also submitted a proposal to levy tobacco and alcohol to fund the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS).

A proposal that every worker contributes 1% of his/her salary to the NHIS, while his/her employer adds 2% to the scheme has also been submitted.

According to him, these are some of the options of finding additional sources of funding to sustain the NHIS policy.

Dr Annor explained that the reason for the suggestion to tax alcohol and tobacco was borne out of the fact that the nation was likely to spend more in treating people with alcohol and tobacco related illness, which will affect the programme.

He said providing additional source of funding to sustain the programme would go a long way to end the cycle of indebtedness of the NHIS to its service providers.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here